Build with Gerardo

Let’s build something useful for climate and cities.

I bring environmental science, geospatial data and software engineering together. I would like to meet people with a different perspective, a problem they understand deeply and the curiosity to explore it together.

Based in London, with roots in the Canary Islands. Currently participating in Carbon13.

Commissioning work rather than looking for a co-founder? See how I work with teams.

Gerardo Ezequiel Martín Carreño
Environmental scientist, spatial data scientist and software engineer.

At a glance

Founder type
Technical: software, data and modelling, with environmental science behind it.
Based
London, and in Cambridge and London for the programme blocks.
Commitment
Part-time while we test directions. Full-time once the venture is funded.
Looking for
Customer understanding, commercial experience or deep scientific and industry knowledge.

From understanding a system to building the software.

As fractional CTO at CommunityAI, I worked from technical audit and roadmap through solution architecture, data engineering, modelling and software delivery. I enjoy connecting technical strategy with the details of making a system work.

My strongest cloud experience is with GCP and cloud-native geospatial tools. I like building systems that can scale, while keeping the first experiment focused on a real question.

CommunityAI, LondonFractional Chief Technology Officer2026–Oct 2026
Started with a technical audit and implementation roadmap, then led solution architecture, data engineering, bespoke spatial modelling and software delivery for an early-stage community-intelligence proof of concept. Set technical strategy and introduced provenance, licence governance, spatial validation and reproducible release controls for location-intelligence and media-optimisation questions.
TJX Europe, LondonFull-Stack Spatial Data ScientistSep 2023–May 2026
Delivered geospatial analysis for European markets and built cloud-native workflows connecting loyalty, footfall and demographic evidence. Automated site-selection, catchment and cannibalisation analysis that had required weeks of manual work.
Metabolism of Cities · Horizon 2020 CityLoops, from LondonResearcher and Spatial Data AnalystFeb 2022–Feb 2023
Co-developed and co-authored CityLoops' Urban Circularity Assessment method; managed two analysts.

From spatial data to working software.

01

Cloud-native geospatial

From Earth observation to queryable spatial evidence.

  • Google Cloud (GCP)
  • BigQuery
  • Earth Engine
  • Cloud Storage
  • Terraform
Shaping Cool Cities

02

Spatial data engineering

Pipelines and open formats that keep data usable.

  • Python
  • SQL
  • PostGIS
  • DuckDB
  • dbt
  • GeoParquet
  • PMTiles
Capabilities on my CV

03

Geospatial ML & science

Environmental features, spatial validation and reproducible models.

  • GeoPandas
  • NumPy
  • scikit-learn
  • XGBoost
  • Vertex AI
  • VoxCity
Urban climate research

04

Interfaces & cartography

Make complex geography legible, interactive and useful.

  • TypeScript
  • React
  • Next.js
  • MapLibre
  • deck.gl
  • Three.js
Capabilities on my CV

One model. Many ways of seeing.

The same place read three ways: the climate acting on it, the assets laid over it and the decisions that connect them. How a place is represented decides which problems become visible, so this is where I start.

How can cities adapt to a warmer world?

Urban heat, climate risk and the built environment. I am interested in how spatial evidence helps us understand exposure, compare interventions and decide what to change about the places we live.

Explore the urban climate research
An illustrative model, not measured data.

Three directions. Each with a way to be wrong.

These are hypotheses I am testing through Carbon13, not products and not a roadmap. Each one names who might pay for it, why location changes the answer, what the first experiment would be and the question that would stop it.

I would rather hear that a direction is wrong than agree politely about it. If you have worked on one of these problems, the last question in each is the one worth answering.

And if a conversation produces a fourth direction that replaces all three, that is the better result. I am looking for someone to choose a problem with, not someone to sell one of these.

All three come from the same method, The Living Section: five questions I put to any place (Enough, Room, Limits, Known, Kept). The directions are where a company could start; the method is how I would keep it clear about what it knows and what it only assumes.

  1. Housing and retrofit

    Know the home before you upgrade it.

    Energy certificates shape retrofit and rental decisions, but the records behind them are often old, estimated or inconsistent from one assessment to the next. I am interested in which homes need a closer look before money is spent.

    Which home records are too uncertain to base an upgrade or compliance decision on?

    Who would buy it
    A retrofit consultancy, survey firm or landlord portfolio deciding which homes to survey first.
    Why location matters
    Building outlines, age and the homes around it show when a recorded wall type, roof or floor area is unlikely to be right.
    What I would bring
    I can join national building and certificate records into a reviewable screening that says what it knows and what it assumes. We would need someone who knows how surveys and upgrades are commissioned.
    What I am missing
    Retrofit coordination or assessment, housing asset management or property lending, with access to the people who commission surveys.
    A first experiment
    Take one portfolio's list of homes, flag the records most likely to be wrong and compare the flags with what the next surveys find.

    Where this could fall apart

    Do uncertain records change which homes get surveyed or upgraded, or do surveyors already catch them at no extra cost?

    Answer this from your experience
  2. Climate risk and finance

    Climate evidence people can act on.

    Connect climate-risk information to real assets and the decisions around them. I am interested in where clearer spatial evidence could improve investment, due diligence and financial disclosure.

    What site evidence is missing before a lender can use a climate-risk report?

    Who would buy it
    A commercial-property lender or technical adviser reviewing a purchase or refinancing.
    Why location matters
    An approximate address can miss the right building, its flood protection or local site conditions.
    What I would bring
    I can connect asset locations, source data and a reviewable interface. We would need someone who knows credit decisions and model acceptance.
    What I am missing
    Property lending, credit risk or technical due-diligence experience.
    A first experiment
    Review five authorised past property files with a lending specialist. Count the meaningful evidence gaps and compare review effort with the current process.

    Where this could fall apart

    Do these evidence gaps delay or change lending decisions often enough for someone to pay to resolve them?

    Answer this from your experience
  3. Buildings and heat

    Cooler places. Less energy.

    Use climate and spatial evidence to help building owners choose upgrades that reduce overheating and energy demand. A place to connect my heat research with practical engineering.

    Which upgrade could reduce overheating without increasing energy use?

    See the urban heat research
    Who would buy it
    An office-estate owner with a cooling replacement or refurbishment decision coming up.
    Why location matters
    Neighbouring buildings, sun exposure and shade change which upgrades make sense.
    What I would bring
    I can build the spatial analysis and the decision tool. We would need building-physics judgement and customer knowledge alongside it.
    What I am missing
    Building-services or estates experience, with insight into how owners choose and buy upgrades.
    A first experiment
    Review one building and three options with its owner and engineer. Compare our recommendation with their existing plan.

    Where this could fall apart

    Would better spatial evidence change the chosen upgrade, or does the existing engineer already have everything they need?

    Answer this from your experience

Shared direction. Room to think.

I would value a co-founder who brings customer understanding, commercial experience or deep scientific and industry knowledge. We should both have space to contribute and challenge each other.

A hybrid rhythm

I value time together and focused asynchronous work. Regular conversations help us think through decisions; clear notes give each of us room to make progress.

A roadmap we define together

I like working in sprints, with a shared vision and mission. We agree what matters, build towards it and stay flexible when the evidence changes.

Curiosity in both directions

I am always learning and enjoy being challenged technically and intellectually. I want us to question assumptions, share what we learn and make something small together before deciding on a bigger commitment.

What I am doing alongside this
I am building geospatial.careers alongside Carbon13. My fractional CTO engagement at CommunityAI ended in October 2026. Carbon13 has my focus for the directions we test; the venture gets all of it once it is funded.
Where I can be, and when
London, and in Cambridge and London in person for the programme blocks. I would want us to spend real time in the same room early, not only on calls.
How I would like to start
A Climatask together, then two or three more weeks on the same problem before either of us commits to anything. A deadline, a disagreement and a setback tell you more about a partnership than any number of good conversations.

The city is also somewhere to walk, notice and question.

More about my background

My academic work began with environmental systems and urban metabolism: understanding how cities use materials, energy and resources. At Metabolism of Cities, I co-developed and co-authored the CityLoops Urban Circularity Assessment methodology.

Street photography and art are part of how I reflect on my practice. They encourage me to notice what a dataset leaves out, question familiar representations and stay curious about how people experience a place.

Explore the creative side of my work

Work I can talk through.

My contribution and the current stage of each.

Completed engagement

CommunityAI

Technical leadership for a community-intelligence venture that helps teams work with public neighbourhood data.

Ongoing research

Shaping Cool Cities

Urban-heat research across six European study areas, combining satellite observations, voxel-based 3D city models and street-level evidence. The work includes a 40,344-cell dataset, comparative maps and a visual research presentation; model validation is being rebuilt.

Start with a conversation.

Tell me what you are exploring, what you would enjoy building and what you would like to ask. No CV or questionnaire needed.

Email me to arrange a first chat. Evenings can work too; suggest a couple of times and your time zone.

Want a starting point? Draft a short introduction.

All questions are optional. Your answers stay in this tab and disappear when you leave. Nothing is submitted to this website.

An observation, an early idea or a question is enough.

Your experience, a responsibility you enjoy or a different perspective.

Skills, judgement or a way of working you would value.

Location, time together, focused work or anything we should discuss.

A short example or a public link, if you would like to share it.

Something you are curious about or would like to challenge.

The draft is optional and stays in your tab until you choose to copy, download or open it in your email app. Website privacy.